VBelo Report

VBelo Report

Share this post

VBelo Report
VBelo Report
Irony, Thy Name is Digs
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
User's avatar
Discover more from VBelo Report
NCAA Men's Volleyball scores, recaps, and news from around the league. Featuring the first and only ELO model for NCAA Men's Volleyball!
Already have an account? Sign in

Irony, Thy Name is Digs

USC pulled off the upset to get the Pac-12/Big Ten Challenge started. Next up: The Outrigger Invitational.

T.J. Breshears's avatar
T.J. Breshears
Mar 07, 2024

Share this post

VBelo Report
VBelo Report
Irony, Thy Name is Digs
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1
Share
USC Athletics

Yesterday, I talked about how digs, as a counting stat, don’t necessarily lead to wins. It did not take long for the volleyball gods to laugh and give me an incredibly ironic box score.

USC pulled off the upset against visiting Penn State in four sets. That is already impressive, but take a look at some of the team stats.

Penn State led in hitting percentage, aces, and blocks. What did USC lead in? That’s right, digs! I love this because a good defense is priceless, even if digs/set isn’t correlated to winning.

In the comments yesterday, digs-to-kills ratio was brought up. So, let’s take a look at the correlation between that and winning.

It turns out, this has the same correlation as digs/set. Digs/set had an R-squared of 0.081 and Kills/Digs had 0.084. Which is to say, they don’t map well to winning. That still doesn’t mean that this metric isn’t important or that digs are worthless. If anything, it shows that winning is complicated and no one stat can capture.


Match Recaps

Pac-12/Big Ten Challenge

Southern California (19%) def. Penn State (81%)
3-1 (25-22, 25-19, 15-25, 25-23)

Non-conference

UC San Diego (96%) def. Saint Katherine (4%)
3-0 (25-16, 25-15, 25-14)

McKendree (80%) def. Missouri S&T (20%)
3-0 (25-19, 25-20, 25-22)

Saint Francis (92%) def. Fort Valley State (8%)
3-1 (25-20, 25-15, 25-27, 25-14)


Match Projections

Outrigger Invitational

Grand Canyon (55%) vs UC Irvine (45%)

Lewis (9%) vs Hawai'i (91%)

Non-conference

Pepperdine (57%) vs Belmont Abbey (43%)

Erskine (32%) vs Lindenwood (68%)

Emmanuel (50%) vs Fort Valley State (50%)

Mount Vernon Nazarene (3%) vs North Greenville (97%)


Subscribe to VBelo Report

By T.J. Breshears · Launched 3 years ago
NCAA Men's Volleyball scores, recaps, and news from around the league. Featuring the first and only ELO model for NCAA Men's Volleyball!

Share this post

VBelo Report
VBelo Report
Irony, Thy Name is Digs
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1
Share

Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Karl France's avatar
Karl France
Mar 7, 2024

Not 1 conference match tonight and I think the match results will go a long way determining the at large berths

Expand full comment
Like
Reply
Share
The SIAC Is Going Dancing in 2024
The NCAA approved the SIAC getting an automatic qualification to the 2024 Men's Volleyball National Tournament while expanding the field to (at least) 8…
Aug 22, 2023 â€¢ 
T.J. Breshears
5

Share this post

VBelo Report
VBelo Report
The SIAC Is Going Dancing in 2024
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1
2024: Welcome back NCAA Men's Volleyball
New conference, new programs, and some new changes to the VBelo model. 2024 is already off to a great start! Also, Canada comes over to play.
Jan 1, 2024 â€¢ 
T.J. Breshears
8

Share this post

VBelo Report
VBelo Report
2024: Welcome back NCAA Men's Volleyball
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
3
Men's Volleyball on Exhibition
The 2025 season begins this week! We got a sneak peak yesterday of three teams looking to add to the trophy cabinet this year. Let's also talk about…
Dec 31, 2024 â€¢ 
T.J. Breshears
6

Share this post

VBelo Report
VBelo Report
Men's Volleyball on Exhibition
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Ready for more?

© 2025 VBelo Report
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Create your profile

User's avatar

Only paid subscribers can comment on this post

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in

Check your email

For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.

Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.